Will Marijuana Legalization in Washington State Affect Your Divorce or Other Family Law Proceeding?

Posted on May 14, 2014 03:11pm

On November 6, 2012, Washington State approved Initiative 502 (‘I-502’) removing state-law criminal and civil penalties for the production, distribution, and possession of marijuana. As a result, parents who have had their time with their children restricted due to marijuana use might legitimately question whether the new law provides a basis for modifying their court order or whether the law will alter the course of their divorce or other family law proceedings in the future.

In short, the answer is no. I-502 likely will have a minimal effect on Washington’s family court system and courts will probably not significantly change their position on the role that marijuana plays in custody determinations or other family law proceedings as a result of its passage.

Here's why:

Custody and Visitation is Determined Based upon the Best Interests of the Child

When determining child custody or visitation schedules, family law courts are concerned primarily with one thing: the best interests of the child in question. They are less concerned, therefore, with what parents choose to do in their free time or personal lives unless it affects their ability to be an effective parent or to provide a safe and stable environment for their child.

With that guiding principle in mind, it becomes easier to understand why I-502 likely will have little effect on a court’s determination in this area. If a parent uses marijuana in a way that renders him or her a neglectful parent or places a child in danger, then its legal status in Washington State will not weigh very heavily in a judge’s decision-making process.

It is common practice, for example, for a judge to take into account whether a parent engages in the excessive use of alcohol when making custody and visitation determinations. As a result, despite the fact that alcohol is legal for adults to consume, an alcoholic parent is simply less likely be receive primary custody of his or her child. The same will likely be true for the legalized use of marijuana.

I-502 Does Not Render Marijuana Use “Legal”

Further, I-502 does not change the status of federal law with respect to marijuana. Under federal law, marijuana is considered a Schedule I Controlled Substance. Thus, even if a family law judge were inclined to permit a parent to engage in the use of any legal drug, marijuana remains outside of this scope under federal law. I-502 would not change a judge’s decision making process as it does not render marijuana use legal under federal criminal law.

What Can Be Done With Respect to Marijuana Use in Family Law Proceedings?

Initiative 502 clearly has not provided a free pass to parents who use marijuana, either recreationally or as part of a medical treatment plan, in a divorce or other family law proceeding. Rather than reference the provisions of I-502, parents should instead explain to the court the how their particular use of marijuana is responsible and develop a plan to ensure that their use does not affect their children. Courts have been amenable to extensive visitation as long as a court order includes restrictions on a parent’s marijuana use, including being under the influence of marijuana during scheduled time with the child.

For more information concerning the changing law in the area, contact a McKinley Irvin family lawyer or read more about child custody proceedings in Washington.

  • Best Lawyers
  • Best Law Firms
  • Super Lawyers
  • AV Preeminent
  • Puget Sound Business Journal Washington's Best Workplaces 2023
  • American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers
  • Best Lawyers - Lawyer of the Year 2024
  • Avvo Rating 10.0
  • "My attorney was very good in and out of the courtroom. Always kept me up to date on any issues that came up. " R.R.
  • "We would highly recommend the knowledgeable and dedicated law firm of McKinley Irvin to anyone who might be seeking legal services. " P.M.
  • "I knew I had made the right decision. From the beginning of my case to conclusion, I knew I had a great team looking out for my best interest. " Christine P.
  • "I cannot imagine two people better able to represent me " M.L.
  • "I always felt my specific needs were very well represented and that I could count on David to be a trusted adviser. " T.M.
Read More