In re the Marriage of Porter, (Div. I, Unpublished, 2007)
Section: Press Center

In re the Marriage of Porter, (Div. I, Unpublished, 2007)

Posted on May 21, 2007 04:05pm

Facts: Dr. Porter, a radiologist, and Ms. Porter, who did not work, were married for 22 years. Dr. Porter made a significant amount of money; he usually earned $54,000 per month. At trial, the court awarded Ms. Porter $8,000 per month maintenance after weighing Dr. Porter’s substantial business assets, including goodwill, against the fact that he was suffering from lymphoma and prostate cancer that limited his ability to work in the future. Ms. Porter appealed asking for more monthly spousal maintenance, arguing that this would not permit her to continue her same standard of living and that the dollar amount awarded was only 15% of Dr. Porter’s monthly income.

Held: Determination of spousal maintenance is solely within the discretion of the broad discretion of the trial court. Absent a showing of abuse of that discretion, the amount of maintenance awarded will not be disturbed on appeal. Here, the court set the amount of maintenance based on Dr. Porter’s health concerns. Ms. Porter is not entitled to continue her previous standard of living as a matter of right; Dr. Porter’s income is also being reduced substantially due to his inability to work.

  • Best Lawyers
  • Best Law Firms
  • Super Lawyers
  • AV Preeminent
  • Puget Sound Business Journal Washington's Best Workplaces 2023
  • American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers
  • Best Lawyers - Lawyer of the Year 2024
  • Avvo Rating 10.0
  • "My attorney was very good in and out of the courtroom. Always kept me up to date on any issues that came up. " R.R.
  • "We would highly recommend the knowledgeable and dedicated law firm of McKinley Irvin to anyone who might be seeking legal services. " P.M.
  • "I knew I had made the right decision. From the beginning of my case to conclusion, I knew I had a great team looking out for my best interest. " Christine P.
  • "I cannot imagine two people better able to represent me " M.L.
  • "I always felt my specific needs were very well represented and that I could count on David to be a trusted adviser. " T.M.
Read More